Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
That argument was unsuccessful in the state courts, but when Murphy went to federal court, the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Eliot Kim
United States During a teleconference briefing last week, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Southeast Asia Patrick Murphy announced that U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am by Jon McLaughlin
 Habitual drunkenness for the space of two years In Murphy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:03 am by South Florida Lawyers
"); see also Hialeah, __ So.2d __, 2009 WL 187584, at *5 n.4 ("Speaking for himself, the writer of the opinion suggests that in an appropriate future case, this court should reconsider Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:13 pm by Corey McGehee
  As Dick Clark presciently recognized on American Bandstand, the song is “a little unusual, a little strange,” and so is the dispute in Everly v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Murphy Oil USA - Houston lawyer Kendall Gray of Andrews Kurth on his blog, The Appellate Record Playing Not to Lose is a Big Mistake - Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Jailed Convicts v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The NPR story notes that Syed, who was 17 years old at the time of the murder, intends to litigate a Miller v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Melina Delcik offers an inside look at how the Times covered this term’s sports-betting case, Murphy v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Murphy, a capital case in which the justices will decide whether Congress has disestablished the boundaries of an Indian reservation in Oklahoma, affecting the state’s ability to prosecute major crimes in the affected area. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Circuit Court in sequential rulings, was Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]