Search for: "Second Watch" Results 1101 - 1120 of 21,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
" (Section 625c, Second Restatement of Torts) This does seem quite familiar and I realised why. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:16 am
Heller Issue: Whether the District of Columbia’s hand gun law violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:33 am
As Adam Savett noted on the Securities Litigation Watch blog (here), courts have been increasingly willing to craft class certification to exclude foreign domiciled claimants at least in certain circumstances. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:50 am by Kevin Milewski
As part of its examination of the first fair use factor concerning the nature and character of the use, the Second Circuit stated that TVEyes’ Watch function was “at least somewhat transformative,” but that because the service was commercial in nature and its Watch function “does little if anything to change the content itself or the purpose for which the content is used,” such transformative character was “modest at best. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:44 pm by David Lat
Second, Wachtell bonuses are calculated as a percentage of base salary. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm by John Elwood
The Court relisted for a second time in RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:07 am by David Lat
Associate Bonus Watch: Ho-Love Gives Bonus Love Associate Bonus Watch 2011 [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm by Laurie Lin
We’ve decided to tweak the format of Legal Eagle Wedding Watch a bit. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 7:40 pm by David A. Beatty
In March 2006, the policy was renewed for a second year while renovations were ongoing. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 1:57 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
I have been recovering from hip replacement surgery (my second) these last two weeks and have watched a lot of daytime television while keeping my leg elevated and ice on my hip. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am by Kate Howard
Ohio 16-5580 Issues: (1) Whether the first attempt to execute the petitioner was cruel and unusual under the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution and if so, whether the appropriate remedy is to bar any further execution attempt on the petitioner; (2) whether a second attempt to execute the petitioner will be a cruel and unusual punishment and a denial of due process in violation of the Eighth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution; and (3)… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Jonathan J. Russell
The post Watch out for that . . . appeared first on Drake, Hileman & Davis, PC. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm by Kate Howard
Florida, for a State court to refuse to accept data from clinical interviews with persons who knew a death-sentenced prisoner during the “developmental period” where the uncontested testimony and scientific and clinical consensus finds such data to be useful in determining the second criteria for intellectual disability, i.e., adaptive functioning deficits; (2) whether it violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, as understood in Atkins and Hall, for a State court to… [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 8:44 pm
Sometimes judges say ludicrous things earnestly, without the extra dollop of smug self-congratulation necessary for inclusion in the coveted Fatuity Watch category. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:52 am
Take six minutes and five seconds from your busy day and watch this. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
  If you missed session one, you can watch it here. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:12 am
  Those of us staying up until nearly 1:30 a.m. to watch the second-longest game in NCAA basketball history will remember that game for a long time. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 7:36 am by Donna Ballman
I'm not sure why this is being done in light of the Florida Supreme Court's ruling last year that pregnancy is already protected.Overtime: Another bill changing Florida's overtime pay law from 10 hours per day to 8 was withdrawn, but this new bill replaces it.Bullying: A second bill that would ban workplace bullying has been filed.Unemployment: A bill that would modify unemployment qualifications is a mixed bag. [read post]