Search for: "Sells v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 14,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Compulife Software, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
The plaintiff alleged that she later learned that the condominium units had been “flipped” by the defendant and his business partner to sell to the plaintiff at a price over and above the market price. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
For decades, CBP and its predecessor agencies allowed Mexicans with border crossing cards to enter the United States to sell plasma. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:42 am
V. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:34 am
See Webster v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:22 pm
A third press release on March 31 admitted that the company never had any masks available to sell. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:55 am
The number of HUD complaints based on refusals to allow ESA’s is growing, and there is a booming industry filing complaints, selling fake service dog paraphernalia, and selling bogus diagnosis of disability. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is AFL Telecommunications, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:58 am
In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm
The statute states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:06 pm
It remains illegal to sell raw milk across state lines, according to federal law. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:22 pm
One approach, not wildly different from the option you describe, is the sale-and-lease-back, under which a state might sell one of its office buildings in a transaction giving it the right to lease it back; the numbers can easily be designed to be identical to what the state would get from selling a bond and pay to service the debt on that bond, but most courts recognize this is not debt. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In 2009, a Ninth Circuit panel held (in Nordyke v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
One Texas case on that issue was denied review in October; a new case from that state, Oliver v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:47 am
However, the Supreme Court disagreed in Sachau v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
A further oddity about the application of a single meaning rule in malicious falsehood cases is that “malice” involves a finding about the defendant’s state of mind. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:42 am
The post Sandy Hook v [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:36 am
In a decision published November 5, 2012 in Amaretto Ranch Breedables LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:30 am
A close reading of the opinion, in light of three later cases decided in the early 19th century, reveals that the Supreme Court intended to recognize "Indian title" while granting the United States a right of first refusal if tribes sought to sell property on the open market to non-Indians. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:31 pm
Robert Nattress & Associates v. [read post]
