Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
" [Motion to appeal denied, 93 N.Y.2d 803.]Howevere, in the event an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent any false answer the individual might give the investigator from being used against the individual if he or she is subsequently charged with perjury [United States v Apfelbaum, 445 US 115].The Ali decision is posted on the Internet at:[archive.citylaw.org] [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997) ("obsessive-compulsive disorder," which the court concluded was not sufficiently stigmatized); Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
By the time the devices were imported into the United States, the Myval System had been approved for use in India and Europe, but not in the United States. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The doctrine can be traced to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in South v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 12:21 am
The US Approach In the United States, ASIs are extraordinary but not unheard of. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm
The case cited, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
See Cruz v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
His story is told through a lawsuit to which he was party, the landmark United States Supreme Court decision Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:31 am
Although the United States Sentencing Committee recently voted to delete any such policy from its Sentencing Guidelines, the invasion into protected attorney-client territory is creeping into other realms. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am
United States 24-482Issue: Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act is penal for purposes of the Constitution’s ex post facto clause. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm
Mynatt v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Apfelbaum, 445 US 115; People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:10 pm
In Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:39 am
United States is an easy case. [read post]
