Search for: "Smith v. Childs" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Carolina Bracken
In R v Smith & Others, three judges in the Court of Appeal considered whether the terms of Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPO) for four separate men were necessary and proportionate. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm by Erwin Chemerinsky
Smith (1990) has held that religious beliefs are not an excuse from general laws. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Jana Singer
  The Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:28 am by Adam Chandler
UPI covers the American Bar Association’s amicus brief in Smith v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Ferguson, the 2nd District holds that the trial court did not err in permitting the State to amend the indictment for child endangering by adding the intent element of recklessness; this did not change the identity of the offense… In State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by Maria Roche
Regina v Smith & Others [2011] EWCA Crim 1772  Read Judgment In a detailed judgment, the Court of Appeal has emphasised the importance of a sentencing court considering whether making a Sexual Offences Prevention Order is necessary and, if so, tightly drafting its terms to be proportionate and not oppressive. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Hipshire, the 2nd District holds that reckless homicide is a lesser included offense of involuntary manslaughter… The 8th District clarifies the child endangering statute in State v. [read post]