Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 3,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
In Part I the author gives an introduction into the traditional trustee liability, continuing with general measures in Part II, before exploring the 2013 UK Supreme Court judgment in Futter v HMRC and its implications for trustees. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
New Jersey, 637 F.3d 177, 181 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Anderson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Reinstatement is not a right and the decision to reinstate a former employee is within the sole discretion of the Commissioner, and who is not required to state a reason for denying the reinstatement; and3. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Reinstatement is not a right and the decision to reinstate a former employee is within the sole discretion of the Commissioner, and who is not required to state a reason for denying the reinstatement; and3. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Disciplinary probationReillo v New York State Thruway Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02170, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York State Thruway Authority employee Anthony Reillo was served with disciplinary charges alleging certain misconduct. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Disciplinary probationReillo v New York State Thruway Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02170, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York State Thruway Authority employee Anthony Reillo was served with disciplinary charges alleging certain misconduct. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
In the end, Doe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 7:51 am
If you are involved in a dispute with your employer in New Jersey or New York, the Resnick Law Group’s employment attorneys are here to help you. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:51 am
” The Court found that New York State Town Law §277 made no provision for a hold back of permits, in addition to the financial security imposed, as set forth in the Clarkstown local law. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:12 am
The best part of the New York Court of Appeals memorandum opinion in Haug v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The relevant arbitration clause stated as follows: Without limiting the Company’s or any other Trump Person’s right to commence a lawsuit in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of New York, any dispute arising under or relating to this agreement may, at the sole discretion of each Trump Person, be submitted to binding arbitration in the State of New York pursuant to the rules for commercial arbitrations of… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The relevant arbitration clause stated as follows: Without limiting the Company’s or any other Trump Person’s right to commence a lawsuit in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of New York, any dispute arising under or relating to this agreement may, at the sole discretion of each Trump Person, be submitted to binding arbitration in the State of New York pursuant to the rules for commercial arbitrations of… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Belmont (1937), United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
In Curling v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 11:10 am
, State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Questioning if the employer knew or should have known of its employee's propensity for sexual misconduct defeats the employer's motion for summary judgmentJohansmeyer v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2018 NY Slip Op 06518, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAnthony Johansmeyer and others [Petitioners] sued the New York City Department of Education and the City of New York [jointly DOE] and Child Center of New… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Questioning if the employer knew or should have known of its employee's propensity for sexual misconduct defeats the employer's motion for summary judgmentJohansmeyer v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2018 NY Slip Op 06518, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAnthony Johansmeyer and others [Petitioners] sued the New York City Department of Education and the City of New York [jointly DOE] and Child Center of New… [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:33 am
., LLC v Fox Rothschild LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 32451(U) October 1, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158900/2017 Judge Saliann Scarpulla determines that one of the entities has no privity (and therefore no case) while the other can (for now) state a cause of action. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:48 am
However, with the plaintiffs being from New York and Florida respectively, the only connection that they alleged between their claims and New Jersey was the defendant smart TV manufacturers’ allegedly “super-massive” presence in New Jersey. [read post]
