Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lorraine Aragon, University of North Carolina, Cut From the Same Cloth? [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:29 am by Tod M. Leaven
  His firm has offices in North and South Carolina, and his Veterans practice is national. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:29 am by Tod M. Leaven
  His firm has offices in North and South Carolina, and his Veterans practice is national. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by Richard Hasen
  DOJ has blocked controversial voter identification laws in Texas and South Carolina. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am by Jennifer González
Letter to His Excellency Patrick Noble, Governor of South Carolina, on the penitentiary system, 1839. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Tilden won the popular vote by a 51-48 margin, but the electoral college was in dispute due to a controversy over how to allocate votes from Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Pa. 2004) Predicting that Colorado, Indiana, Kansas, South Carolina, and Tennessee would recognize cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in antitrust cases. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Mark Theodore
  This month, in a separate case filed by the United States Chamber of Commerce in South Carolina, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals also invalidated the rule. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
It posits the question "What if instead of ‘Bong Hits 4 Jesus,' the banner had said ‘Bong Stinks 4 Jesus,'" reporting on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]