Search for: "State of California v. Superior Court" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2015, 9:57 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
However, the state with the most – California – had 141 – which is 6 percent higher, despite the fact that California’s population is 95 percent higher than Florida’s. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:00 am by Sara Thorpe
It will be interesting to see what (if anything) the California Supreme Court does with the recent Clarendon v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:45 am
A suit over the patdown policy of spectators attending San Francisco 49er's NFL football games as violating the state right to be free from unreasonable searches was dismissed on a demurrer by the Superior Court and affirmed on appeal. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy, mostly-unpublished opinion filed on August 14, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the superior court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging the Parkmerced Development Project. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Kelso details the first decades of the iconic San Quentin Prison, and of the California Supreme Court’s key role in safeguarding the public’s interest by exercising necessary oversight of the Legislature and the governor.Also in this issue, David Ettinger notes the centennial of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Piper v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:26 pm
Superior Court (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 1086. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:16 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
Superior Court were reported in November as follows: Verdict of Almost $70,000 After State Farm Insurance Offers Only $30,000 for Settlement Villalobos v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The decision of the NIGC, the federal agency charged with approving and disapproving management contracts under IGRA, is binding on lower courts unless successfully challenged in a United States District Court. [read post]