Search for: "State v. Beers" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
In the whimsically captioned Cupcake & Boomboom, LLC v Aslani, 2016 NY Slip Op 32310(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 22, 2016], the outcome was anything but whimsical for the defendant. [read post]
1 Sep 2005, 3:35 pm by Alexander
"Frank stopped himself in mid sentence realizing that he was talking to an ambassador from the evil planet "V" and back tracked with noteworthy grace given his emotional state. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
Thirdly, the earlier trade mark must have a reputation in the European Union, in the case of an earlier CTM, or in the Member State concerned, in the case of an earlier national trade mark. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
To learn more, please see our 50 State Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Desktop Reference. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Someone recently asked me what Lawrence v Texas was about. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am by admin
   “This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
  The court will likely find them to be highly recognizable; (v) Whether JWE intended to create an association with one or more of Duke’s mark. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:41 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
(v) Other showings that are relevant to the issues identified in paragraphs (i) to (iv) of this subdivision. [read post]