Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 1101 - 1120 of 19,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
  The New York Times doesn't mention it, but the "offense" that got Bill Murphy(effectively) fired at Ole Miss was his insistence on teaching that Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The government denied the subsequent change order request (submitted by Syska), stating that the pond work was in the scope of the original contract and Syska withheld money owed for other aspects of the work to make up the difference for the previously billed pond work. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
            Senate Bill 1912 exempts units of local government, the State of Illinois and Illinois state employees. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 4:35 am by Jon Gelman
This bill represents a step in the wrong directionbecause an increase in the annual SIF surcharge would threatenthe State’s ability to keep existing employers in the State andundermine efforts to attract new ones. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 7:13 pm by Daniel Schwartz
Does the qualified privilege for job references still apply as originally discussed by the Connecticut in Miron v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 We therefore suggest that Section 14 of the Bill be modified to state: The following contracts cannot be specifically enforced "All contracts can be specifically enforced unless the promisor in breach of the contract establishes that... [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:14 pm
The judge felt that a genuine issue of material fact remained but stated on the record, if we went to trial and I was successful, the defense would not be able to defend against attorney fees for over 90 percent of the bills. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
Provisions of the Bill were incorporated against the states with ridiculous casualness in cases like Gitlow and Cantwell v CT. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 1:15 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states in relevant part that No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. [read post]