Search for: "State v. Christopher" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Denver, Colorado -- Intellectual property lawyers for Steak n Shake Enterprises, Inc. and Steak n Shake, LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana (collectively "Steak n Shake") sued in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that Globex Company, LLC; Springfield Downs, LLC; Christopher Baerns; Larry Baerns; Kathryn Baerns and Control, LLC, all of Colorado, are infringing the "Steak n Shake" marks, which have been registered by the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 pm by VMaryAbraham
v=gH476CxJxfg Today was a good day. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” In her complaint, the plaintiff alleged that, “after waiting a number of years and having little communication,” the defendant Christopher D. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:50 am by Sandy Levinson
  Whether this would have been good for the United States is certainly debatable. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
(forthcoming 2025).From SmartCILP:Nicole V. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case law is still developing in this area.The case is Whittaker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Ronald Mann
Dèjá vu was the theme of the day on the second morning of the October argument session, as the Justices listened to arguments in DIRECTV v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm by Lucy Reed
I have learnt that it is usually a good idea to sleep on it after reading a Christopher Booker article, and not to write in anger. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
’” Briefly: In the latest installment of his “Drama in the Courtroom” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at the “famously bad” oral argument in Flood v. [read post]