Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am by Josh Wright
”  Recall the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:26 am by Andres
Lost in this idiotic “Google v musicians” rhetoric has been the threat that both Art 11 and 13 represent to small entities. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:39 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Dominic McGoldrick, Religion in the European Public Square and in European Public Life—Crucifixes in the Classroom? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:05 pm by Mark Summerfield
  The privilege that exists between a client and a lawyer is established under the common law, by the Commonwealth Evidence Act 1995, and by similar provisions of state legislation in some states.In Australia, patent attorneys are generally not also lawyers, however section 200 of the Patents Act 1990 provides that communications, records or documents made for the dominant purpose of a registered patent attorney providing intellectual property advice enjoys the same privilege… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The overlooked majority: the limits of Whitney v CIRRichard Thomas (First Tier Tribunal, UK)7. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Daily Beast, Geoffrey Stone criticizes Monday’s ruling in Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
This is especially problematic given the increasing dominance and global reach of these large enterprises in the face of the expanding attempts of local courts and local laws to impose responsibilities on these social media giants to protect their citizens. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am by Ronald Mann
The Court next week will hear oral arguments in what may be the highest-stakes (at least in terms of dollars potentially at stake) case of the Term, Universal Health Services v United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 11:59 pm
The Ninth recites the new Supreme Court standard for this too-frequent situation, in United States v. [read post]