Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 1101 - 1120 of 35,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2019, Warby J gave Judgment in the case of Triplark Limited v  Northwood Hall (Freehold) Limited (2) Philip Whale (3) David Wismayer [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am by INFORRM
The TİB stated that this was the only technical means of blocking the offending site, as its owner lived abroad. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:57 am by Richard
The State of Georgia does allow its citizens to consider both options. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:47 pm by Amy Howe
The denial came just under six months after the Supreme Court, in Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Martinez (state university funding of religious group). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:30 pm by admin
In a highly anticipated decision – in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:06 pm
Stevens case — arguing in favor of striking down the speech... [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
The Seventh Circuit has recently handed down two new decisions relating to class action procedure (in addition to the new CAFA "less is not more" decision discussed at this blog post): In Rahman v. [read post]