Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 1101 - 1120 of 36,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2018, 6:57 am by Richard
The State of Georgia does allow its citizens to consider both options. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am by INFORRM
The TİB stated that this was the only technical means of blocking the offending site, as its owner lived abroad. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:06 pm
Stevens case — arguing in favor of striking down the speech... [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:47 pm by Amy Howe
The denial came just under six months after the Supreme Court, in Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Martinez (state university funding of religious group). [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
The Seventh Circuit has recently handed down two new decisions relating to class action procedure (in addition to the new CAFA "less is not more" decision discussed at this blog post): In Rahman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:30 pm by admin
In a highly anticipated decision – in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
  The trial counsel who argued noted that in LTC Lakin’s unsworn statement, his focus was always on himself: how he was concerned about the President’s eligibility, how he felt his concerns needed to be addressed, and so on, until the moment came to accept responsibility — at which point the accused focused on other people and how they let him down or supposedly misled him. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:09 am
  The Court did so in Montejo v. [read post]