Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 1101 - 1120 of 9,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am by Alicia Maule
Reed’s case to the 21st Judicial District Court in Bastrop County for an evidentiary hearing, which was held in July 2021. [read post]
20 May 2014, 12:05 pm
It’s likely the state will seek a stay, and that the district court or higher court will eventually enter one. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:59 am by admin
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court judge for damages. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
" It is hoped that they won't takes that ball and go home without first approving appropriate judicial compensation. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Susan Klein
Increased judicial sentencing discretion, along with concomitant sentencing disparities, is in large measure the result of the 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
Dunn (1821) the Supreme Court established the principle that a congressional contemnor could seek judicial relief, and in Kilbourn v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
 The court upheld one of the districts but ruled that the district court had employed the wrong standard in assessing whether race was the predominant factor in drawing the lines of the other 11 districts, and remanded the case to the district court to evaluate those 11 districts under the proper standard. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The district court held that petitioners’ complaint failed to state a claim as a matter of law and dismissed the case. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
The Government argues that the retroactive application of Johnson does not violate the Due Process Clause because the Supreme Court's judicial interpretation of the statute was neither unexpected nor indefensible.In a recent unpublished decision, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am by Peter Spiro
That will offend judicial sensibilities—already evidenced by the district court orders over the weekend—which start with procedural regularity. [read post]