Search for: "State v. J. D. C."
Results 1101 - 1120
of 3,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-1366, would justify readers in feeling a bit of déjà vu all over again. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
KIT KAT is back as the Advocate General gives his two fingerstwo centsNestlé v Mondelez v EUIPO Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P (April 2018)In Volume II we reported on Nestlé’s loss of its UK shape mark for the four finger Kit Kat chocolate bar. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
No. 16-341-JFB-SRF.United States District Court, D. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Navarro, April 2, 2018, Thomas, C.). [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
In November 2016, the Office of the Mayor disclosed more than 1,500 pages of previously withheld communications between respondents and BerlinRosen, and stated that the Office of the Mayor had by that point disclosed "all responsive email communications with Jonathan Rosen and BerlinRosen which involve[d] any other client of BerlinRosen. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm
" (Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:12 pm
In his March 1996 claim, he stated he was “request[ing] s/c [service connection] for disabilities occurring during active duty service[.] [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
On 26 April 2018, Warby J heard an application in the case of Miah v BBC. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 7:41 am
DARENSBURG, JUDGE PRESIDING.APPEAL DISMISSED.Brian D. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am
Manafort, Trump’s campaign manager; Roger J. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
This means that the receiving Office (RO) ascertains whether the failure to file the international application within the priority period- occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken ("due care" criterion), or- was unintentional ("unintentional" criterion).Rule 49ter.1 PCT foresees in its paragraph (a) that, where the RO has restored a right of priority under the "due care" criterion, that restoration must, subject to its paragraph… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
This means that the receiving Office (RO) ascertains whether the failure to file the international application within the priority period- occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken ("due care" criterion), or- was unintentional ("unintentional" criterion).Rule 49ter.1 PCT foresees in its paragraph (a) that, where the RO has restored a right of priority under the "due care" criterion, that restoration must, subject to its paragraph… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
," an anti-libel injunction should (a) say, "Defendants ... are enjoined from libelously stating," (b) expressly provide that any criminal contempt prosecutions will be conducted before a jury, and (c) expressly provide that the injunction could not be enforced through threat of confinement for civil contempt. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:26 pm
For your taxes from A to Z, here’s the rest of the series: A is for Annual Contribution Limits B is for Bonus C is for Choate D is for Direct Deposit E is for Enrolled Agent F is for Found Property G is for Ghost Preparer H is for Hobby Loss Rules I is for Installment Agreement J is for Joint Accounts K is for Kin (Crypto) L is for Line of Credit M is for Mileage N is for NIIT O is for Organ Donations P is for Private and Parochial Schools Q is for Qualifying… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:12 pm
For your taxes from A to Z, here’s the rest of the series: A is for Annual Contribution Limits B is for Bonus C is for Choate D is for Direct Deposit E is for Enrolled Agent F is for Found Property G is for Ghost Preparer H is for Hobby Loss Rules I is for Installment Agreement J is for Joint Accounts K is for Kin (Crypto) L is for Line of Credit M is for Mileage N is for NIIT O is for Organ Donations P is for Private and Parochial Schools Q is for Qualifying… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 12:59 pm
Burgess v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:07 am
By Andrew C. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:29 pm
C. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Finally, in the midst of Chinese exclusion, the Supreme Court handed down the most significant citizenship case it ever decided, United States v. [read post]
