Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
TeeVee Toons, Inc., 555 F.3d 949, 955 (11th Cir. 2009) (existence of license asserted as an affirmative defense to copyright infringement claim); Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:09 am
The Colorado Supreme Court recently handed down its decision in Miller v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
Jacobs of Greenwire profiles John Korzen, the Wake Forest law professor who will make his oral argument debut at the Court next week representing the respondents in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
In Horne v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
State, 2003 OK CR 11, 71 P.3d 30, and Salazar v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am
However, as in civil procedure applicable in the United States, parties may move to compel disclosure if the opposing party refuses or fails to produce documents. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:53 pm
Courtney v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:35 pm
In today’s case (Jacobs v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
But others like Senate sponsor Jacob Howard made the same argument when explaining the meaning of “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” to the Senate (though Howard also added the personal guarantees expressed in the first 8 amendments) when it was under consideration. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Perez, and Jacob J. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Certainly this reasoning is supported by the authorities cited by Floyd J at [85]-[89], to the effect that even though an invention is obvious to try, it is nonetheless obvious only if it is “more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work” (Lord Justice Jacob in St Gobain v Fusion Provida [2005] EWCA Civ 177 [35]) and there must be a “fair expectation of success” (Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 [42].) [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
Mr Justice Nugee heard the application and what follows is taken from the transcript.He was keen from the outset to inspect the physical samples of the products, confirming the approach to registered design cases advocated by Sir Robin Jacob in Dyson v Vax:“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
Rohini Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm
In his 6-2 majority decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Jurisprudence has evolved in the UK, Germany, Netherlands and other member states. [read post]
