Search for: "State v. Long" Results 1101 - 1120 of 46,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
Virginia in 1967, when only 17 states still banned interracial marriage; or Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:30 am by Howard Bashman
And Mark Sommerhauser of The Wisconsin State Journal reports that “SCOTUS changes prompt new focus on Wisconsin’s long-dormant abortion ban. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Pervasive skepticism toward state legal processes is a long road with no turning. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:59 am by Simon Birkett, Clean Air in London
They say timing is everything and it certainly was when the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 28 on 29 April 2015. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:03 pm
For a long time, there was no statute of limitations for federal habeas claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm by Amy Howe
The post Court issues orders from “long conference,” but relists some high-profile cases appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
"The other comes from Judge Berzon (joined by Judge Hurwitz):"Even within the questionable genre of dissents from denial of rehearing en banc, see Martin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Sue Ghosh Stricklett
In what many regard as the intellectual property case of the century, the United States Supreme Court has—on October 7, 2020—presided over oral arguments in Google v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:41 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Today the Seventh Circuit handed down a fascinating set of opinions on the Fourth Amendment implications of long-term GPS monitoring: United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am by Paul Horwitz
This being a blog, I will also link to a recent piece of mine on institutional actors in New York Times v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:23 am
That case essentially stated waivers don't have to be written in very specific language in order to be enforced, so long as it's clear to those signing the legal rights they are giving up. [read post]