Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
Baker & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government& Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 141. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
It is the State and its Courts that have authority to coerce a Party who has not complied with his bargain. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am
The leading flooding case in Texas is Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:35 am
The appellants, SC and CB (“the adult appellants”), SC’s three youngest children and CB’s five children (“the child appellants”), brought proceedings against the respondents, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the Lords Commissioners of HM Treasury, and the Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Mance stated that CMR, art 34, qualifies the position that a successive carrier becomes party to the contract of carriage under the terms of the consignment note. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze, heard 12-13 Mar 2019. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
DONE at the city of Washington this thirty-first day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred eighty and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred fifth. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
She said she found out that inside the police department, there is a cult which states that they are children of Satan and worship demonistic things. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 3:2 majority, with Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt giving the leading judgment (with whom Lord Kerr agreed) and Lord Burrows and Lord Sales each giving dissenting judgments. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
This, as Lord Kerr found, was simply wrong. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
The House of Lords begins the Committee Stage of the Data Protection Bill on 30 October 2017. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 7:26 am
It is not unknown for HL decisions to be influenced by politics (for example Lord Hoffmans judgement in Birmingham City Council v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
Lord Woolf CJ controversially stated: “A public figure is entitled to a private life. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Kingston v. [read post]
