Search for: "State v. Lyles" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 12:22 pm
Petersburg Times of Tampa Bay predicts that a ruling in favor of the state in Florida v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:49 am by NCC Staff
At the same time, there is a similar case about Pennsylvania redistricting in the federal court system, and the United States Supreme Court is considering a possible landmark gerrymandering decision from Wisconsin in Gill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Eugene Kontorovich
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
"And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has a post titled "Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Cormac Early
Berman of the Sentencing Law and Policy blog reports on a Florida case which “spotlights an on-going struggle for state courts” to follow the Court’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:26 pm
The seminal cases were Harper v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the developments for this blog; other coverage comes from Lawrence Hurley of Reuters. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am by Amy Howe
   (Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog.) [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston reports on the status of the court’s request six months ago that the parties in Zubik v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Fahy presented oral argument in the 1st internment case to reach the Supreme Court, Hirabayashi v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Lyle Denniston
This is the way the Justices put it in the 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]