Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
" The states, cities and other state agencies joining Cuomo in the challenge included: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Rhode Island, Vermont, the District of Columbia and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
In the case, Deschenes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:42 am
There were no faithless elector this time and, on the heels of Chiafalo v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:19 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice) State of Minnesota v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:19 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice) State of Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:50 pm
In Michaud v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:55 pm
In Haidak v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
For the majority, Lord Wilson gave the main judgment. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:39 pm
On February 20, 2008, the Court unanimously affirmed the First Circuit decision in Rowe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:19 pm
John V. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:19 am
State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
Revel, Enzo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
See, e.g., Welch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Hughes states that the acid test should be whether the application is in substance (impermissibly) to vary or alter the final order or whether it is (permissibly) to support it by working out how it should be carried into effect [54]. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:06 am
On Friday, the high court in two states issued opinions relating to foreclosures. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
The date of a judgment entered prior to July 1, 2015 is computed in accordance with the Rules in effect when the judgment was entered.Turning next to relevant caselaw, the court cited its prior discussion (in Hiob v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am
I thought I was in the wrong state. [read post]
