Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 10,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 5:01 am
The SJC recently heard oral arguments in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
In Reading Area Water Authority v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
Balancing the fishes’ scales: Tribal, State, and Federal interests in fishing rights and water quality in Maine. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:36 pm
Z o.o v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Steven Rowe, Attorney General of Maine v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
United States and New York v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:29 pm
Per Fitzgerald v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Toller v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:35 pm
The motion in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:47 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
That decision is in conflict with numerous other circuit court decisions and the highest court of a state decided both before and after Bush v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:01 am
Jarrett Dieterle, R Street Institute] California fisheries and Chevron deference: “An Otter Travesty by the Administrative State” [Ilya Shapiro on Cato cert amicus petition in California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm
The petition of the day is: Alger v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:15 pm
United States, No. 09-1408. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm
II § 1 Maine Art. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm
The main purpose of the exhibits in this case was for police business in maintaining the safety of the highway. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm
This case involves the Pandabuy service, “an online shopping platform that allows consumers to purchase goods from third-party Chinese e-commerce platforms based in China which do not ship directly to the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
