Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2011, 7:28 pm
Those who are unable to master this ability will suffer. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:49 am by Randall Reese
That proposed Compromise Agreement relates to a November 7, 2007 Master Lease between the related companies. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am by Beth Graham
Easterbrook of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is not only a brilliant judge, writer and law professor, but a master of (among many other things) arbitration law. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
… and then Darren takes the floor for a more in-depth analysis.* Canary Wharf: great place name, not much hope for a trade mark ...Jeremy writes upCanary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision with a history, and a curious trade mark tale too.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the… [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
 Simplifying Community Registered Design litigation in the UK - Spin Master v PMSGuestKat Rosie Burbidge also reminds readers that there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants it to get wider circulation. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Anna Christensen
The Court also scheduled for oral argument in due course the first exception to the first interim report of the Special Master in 137-Original, Montana v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court so far has issued one preliminary ruling on the case of Montana v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Northern Ireland On 7 November 2023, judgment was handed down in O’Neill v Carson (Defamation) [2023] NIMaster 9 by Master Bell following a default judgment awarded to the plaintiff on 13 December 2022. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
  In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]