Search for: "State v. Means" Results 1101 - 1120 of 61,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 11:06 am by Marx Sterbcow
This decision means that states can now enforce their own state laws against national banks so long as they follow due process procedures set forth under state law. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Will Baude
"  Another may examine the suggestion that even if Trump is constitutionally disqualified from being President of the United States, that does not mean he is constitutionally ineligible to be elected as President of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
So, when they say a state jail felon is a felon for purposes of section 46.04, they mean it. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
I’ve taken a day to chew over the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:36 pm by Amy Howe
However, the bench that heard today’s oral argument in Howell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below, I lay out another, heretofore unexamined, way in which ISL theory makes jejune and unsupportable assumptions about the meaning of constitutional text.One easy starting point to access this additional argument is the Supreme Court’s seminal 2015 case rejecting ISL, Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am by CMS
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]