Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 19 June 2019 HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court released a few notable opinions this week: on Monday, it announced its ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
: on Mrs K Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am by Matt Bodie
Anders Walker explores how three moderate Southern governors formulated masked resistance in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Oxford University Press Stuart, Gary L. (2004) Miranda: the Story of America’s Right to Remain Silent. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 3:36 am
Louisiana:Kennedy's Footnote Buried in Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Frank Cranmer
: off-topic, but an interesting take on Grainger v Nicholson. [read post]