Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 11,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2010, 1:02 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:37 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
(See Baldwin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
MISO operates in the midwest and in the Great Plains states while PJM operates in the mid-Atlantic region but has midwestern enclaves in and surrounding Chicago and in southwestern Michigan. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Knox v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:21 am
See id. at 939–43 (citing United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
[www.angel-diaz.us]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
Far from containing the “plain statement” necessary to preclude application of federal discovery rules, Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to my Plain English preview of Elonis v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
He further stated the District Court’s ruling “seems like a plain legal error. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
The Obamacare case, King v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:32 am
United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:39 am
Instead, CSU attempted to rely on dicta an earlier case, City of Marina v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen covers yesterday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
iStock_000000355220_L1.jpg Failure to object at trial to admission of the defendant's unredacted DVD recording of his confession (including his statements that he had "aided and abetted" the robbery) only left appellate review under the plain error standard despite the lack of relevance and its unwarranted focus on propensity, in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:36 am
iStock_000000130176.jpg In child pornography prosecution, detective's lay or expert testimony that images on the defendant's computer media satisfied the legal definition of child pornography was not helpful to the jury since it was only a "bare conclusion"; however its admission was not plain error based on the defense concession in closing argument that the photos were pornographic and that the defense only denied producing the photos, in United… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
