Search for: "State v. So "
Results 1101 - 1120
of 117,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 7:33 pm
., and we reprint it in its entirety:IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FLORIDA BAR,Complainant,v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
In so doing, the Court avoids a rather serious charge of bait and switch. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Meuser v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Though, to be honest, I'd rather have Cythia Albritton perform this task than the State of California.But barely. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:33 pm
In Stuart v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:27 am
" Sansone v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 8:59 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am
”) State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:52 am
In either event, so long as the probation is not revoked, the defendant will not be incarcerated at all. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 pm
There's still an Establishment Clause claim there, but in my view, the Ninth Circuit correctly (implicitly) recognized that this was a weaker claim that the Due Process argument, so sidestepped it. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:06 pm
See US ex rel Oberg v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 9:21 pm
So the kind of threat implied by Robie's question would not be unthinkable in Scruggsylvania. [read post]
