Search for: "State v. South" Results 1101 - 1120 of 11,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm by Amanda Pickens
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:49 am
Only two state court cases (that I have found) cite to the rule at all, Bragg v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
Loving was decided in 1967 after almost all states outside the South allowed blacks and whites to marry. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The case, once again, is Native American Council of Tribes v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:01 am by Jim Chen
Jim Chen, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act, downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962: In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:01 am by Jim Chen
Jim Chen, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act, downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962: In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]