Search for: "State v. Texas City"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Dickson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:40 am
In 2010 during Hartfield v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The current team of lawyers for Hill, the client being tapped for the multi-million dollar amount in attorney’s fees by his former counsel is crying foul, and three amicus briefs, including one by AG Paxton filed on behalf of the State of Texas, have joined the chorus. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
In Texas, for example, a collection action is subject to a four-year limitations period under TEX. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
While in the Windy City, the justice also presented the Martin D. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
” Hallco Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Fortunately, Houston is one of the most resilient cities in the United States, and optimism can be found on every corner. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio’s tangible personal property tax, levied by local taxing authorities alongside real property taxes, raised a combined $1.7 billion in local revenues in fiscal year 2005, much of which flowed to school districts ($1.2 billion), though counties ($319 million), cities and villages ($92 million), and townships ($67 million) also leaned on the tax as a source of revenue.[13] Tangible personal property taxes are “taxpayer active,” meaning that taxpayers bear the compliance… [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 1:43 am
(Indeed, Loftium advises homebuyers that they must obtain a business license from the city of Seattle.) [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” Briefly: At The Texas Tribune, Alexa Ura reports that the city of Houston has asked the Supreme Court to review a decision of the Texas Supreme Court “thr[o]w[ing] out a lower court ruling that said spouses of gay and lesbian public employees are entitled to government-subsidized marriage benefits and unanimously order[ing] a trial court to reconsider the case. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 7:05 am
That Court, on September 12, 2017, in Beydoun v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:26 pm
Moore v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
City of Tuscaloosa, just affirmed the verdict. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Edwards, Inc. v. [read post]
