Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 3,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
It might seem strange that congressional apportionment includes noncitizens who cannot vote. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:39 am
State v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
Today, in Sackett v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:14 pm
Cook v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
DeShaney v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:20 am
This point seems impossible to square with Carhart.4) Throughout the majority opinion, Justice Kennedy assumes the validity of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am
(Strangely, Womack is also listed as concurring with the dissent, but he's not listed among the judges signing onto the actual dissent.) [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 12:34 pm
Similarly, a few years earlier in Northwest Austin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:56 am
In this context, it is a strange claim to make that federal agency preemption is about preserving government agency powers. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Judgment Released: October 12, 2010 Link to Judgment A motion was brought by new counsel to the Plaintiff to strike the action from the trial list because, among other reasons, the expert medical reports which were served before January 1, 2010, did “…not contain the information and documents now required by Rule 53.03(2.1) . . . [...] [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:06 am
Remember when we covered Torres-Negron v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
But that doesn't make it any less strange. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:54 pm
US v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:51 am
Co., 505 F.2d 547, 554-55 (9th Cir. 1974) (rejecting the "strange thesis" that a bail bondsman is "an arm of the court"); Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
Mr Justice Gillen’s judgment in the case of Lee, Morrison and X v News Group Newspapers ([2010] NIQB 106) has now been made public. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
Since what the Directive purports to protect is privacy rather than economic rights, it would be strange if the Directive could not compensate those individuals whose data privacy had been invaded by a data controller so as to cause them emotional distress (but not pecuniary damage). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn -- EC v. CBT
24 May 2013, 12:46 pm
(The trial judge strangely brushed aside the online activities altogether.) [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
Supreme Court in a First Amendment case -- McCullen v. [read post]
