Search for: "T. GORDON" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 6:23 am by Jim Sedor
Oregon: Oregon Judge to Decide If Political Spending Limits Are LegalPortland Oregonian – Gordon Friedman | Published: 8/15/2017 Oregon is one of six states with no limits on campaign donations and spending. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
When the story of the long march of civil rights is told, this moment will—I hope, if I don’t quite predict—be seen as a late and ultimately futile response to the successes of the freedom struggles of the last fifty years. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
This summer, we asked many of you this question (H/t: Law & History CRN). [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 5:57 am by Walter Olson
I also appeared on Guy Gordon’s radio show on Detroit’s WJR, and wrote a piece for Cato at Liberty on a dispute between Google and the federal government on employment discrimination and employee privacy that would probably be getting more attention if the memo story weren’t consuming all the oxygen in the room. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:57 pm
Louis Cristián Castro - Universidad Diego Portales INQ / Global Inequalities Sérgio Costa - Freie Universität Berlin Lena Lavinas - Universidade Federal do Río de Janeiro INT / International Relations Carol Wise - University of Southern California Cintia Quiliconi - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias… [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Philip Gordon is an associate at Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLC and contributed to the NRCC’s brief. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
NOW.A truly excellent article on Linkedin by Gordon Orr, entitled, Why Boards Should Worry About China. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 7:36 am by Steven Koprince
 The bill isn’t clear, but it doesn’t seem to make sense to penalize the incumbent in this situation. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:07 am by Alfred Brophy
 That, of course, makes it imperative that we have an intestacy regime that makes sense -- and on this Deborah Gordon and I will have something to say in the not-too-distant future. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
” … [T]he First Amendment constitutionally bars the government from criminally punishing 1) true speech about the conduct of public officials, regardless of the intent motivating the speech, and 2) false statements about the conduct of public officials unless knowingly false or made with reckless disregard of their falsity (i.e., unless made with actual malice). [read post]