Search for: "Temple v. Temple" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To acquire or dispose of an asset, including real or personal property in this or another state, for cash or on credit, at public or private sale, and to manage, develop, improve, exchange, partition, change the character of, or abandon an estate asset; v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:28 am
Miller (University of Cincinnati College of Law) has posted State DOMAs, Neutral Principles, and the Mobius of State Action (Temple Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 9:04 am
. - Law), Self-Execution by Subject Matter after Medellín v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:28 pm
Waltenburg PUBLICATION DATE: December 2008 PUBLISHER: Temple University Press PAGE COUNT: 224 pp. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Yesterday in Garden Grove, California, the parties announced a settlement in Vietnamese Buddhism Study Temple in America v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:00 am
When the township petitioned the Michigan Supreme Court to review the case, the state's high court instead vacated the Court of Appeals decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of another RLUIPA case the state Supreme Court had just decided-- Greater Bible Way Temple of Jackson v City of Jackson. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 9:34 am
  Surprisingly, his access to the internet was not restricted, presumably because he voluntarily complied with the law in taking down the songs posted earlier.The Complaint in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
However, few teams will change in strength too much from last year.College FootballGame MatchupsAugust 23 to September 1,2008 (visitor v. home)Game below played on August 30 unless otherwise stated. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:02 pm
  The lawsuit, filed by the Association of the Sovereign Order of the Temple of Christ, alleges that the Catholic hierarchy wrongly persecuted the group and illegally seized its assets. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:13 pm
While free speech advocates from across the ideological spectrum cheered the Third Circuitâ € ™s ruling in DeJohn v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 9:18 pm
They claim that when the order was dissolved by his predecessor Pope Clement V in 1307, more than 9,000 properties as well as countless pastures, mills and other commercial ventures belonging to the knights were appropriated by the church. 1307? [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm
The case is about whether a Mormon temple should be exempt from business rates: it is, under Schedule 5, paragraph 11 of the Local [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Gallagher (Valuation Officer) v Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints House of Lords “A Mormon Temple, which was open only to Mormons in good standing, was not a place of public religious worship within the meaning of paragraph 11(1)(a) of Schedule 5 to the Local Government Finance Act 1988 and was thus not exempt from the rating list. [read post]