Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Doe"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Florida Bar v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
The Florida Bar (5-4 per Roberts for plurality). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
To reiterate, the impact rule does not bar someone from claiming mental trauma when they have suffered a physical injury or impact. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:46 am
” Hervey v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:48 pm
Martinez has been a member of The Florida Bar since 1997. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:35 am
Padilla v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
In the case of Tug Valley Pharmacy, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
April Warren of the Ocala StarBanner reports that the American Bar Association has filed an amicus brief asking the Court “to overturn the portion of Florida’s death penalty law that allows defendants to be sentenced to death following a non-unanimous jury recommendation. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 am
And it called attention to reports that, in 2007, a woman in Florida had given birth at 21 weeks and six days after conception. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Horowitz v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am
But Florida law does not have any such provision. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:23 am
The dynamics of construction site workplace liability was the subject of a recent decision of Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal, Ciceron v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:28 am
The Florida Supreme Court in Tracey v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida; and Paul E. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida; and Paul E. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm
The Court acknowledged that Florida does allow activities that might create some suspicion over whether judges are beholden to or favor donors, but concluded that “narrowly tailored” does not mean “perfectly tailored,” and that the “First Amendment does not put a State to [an] all-or-nothing choice. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Florida, 14-7884, asking whether the Florida Supreme Court violated clearly established law by allowing a trial court that had found reasonable doubt regarding the defendant’s competency to then allow the defendant to represent himself at his own competency hearing. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Florida that any determination of intellectual disability must be made pursuant to clinical standards. [read post]
