Search for: "Thomas Just" Results 1101 - 1120 of 17,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 1:27 am by Seán Binder
  The post Early Edition: June 29, 2023 appeared first on Just Security. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:53 pm by Chris Castle
Porter and his writing parter Isaac Hayes wrote classic hits for Sam & Dave, Carla Thomas and many Stax Records’ artists. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:46 am by Seán Binder
Cassandra Vinograd and Thomas Gibbons-Neff report for the New York Times. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Barrett, joined by Justice Thomas, would have opted for what is basically a negligence standard (again, oversimplifying slightly). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch (discussed on the Forum here); and Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch (discussed on the Forum here); and Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm by Amanda Shanor
In a concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas urged his colleagues to reconsider the overbreadth doctrine in a future case. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurrence in the judgment for himself and Justices Thomas and Barrett. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
Barnes and Thomas Gibbons-Neff report for the New York Times. [read post]
” Justice Clarence Thomas concurred, criticizing the judicial doctrine of overbreadth, writing, “This case demonstrates just how far courts have drifted from their original station of adjudicating the rights of the parties before them in accordance with law. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm by Karen Pita Loor and Cassidy Heverling
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority, in a decision joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Although the article might not have been entirely clear here, it in fact suggests just the opposite of Gorsuch, and it concludes differently than Thomas—the Indian Commerce Clause does not allow Congress to give the tribes authority to intervene in state adoptions. [read post]