Search for: "U.S. v. Card*" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says these rules do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Vugo, Inc. v. [read post]
As a result, the relator’s burden to prove the tax obligation required proof that the taxpayer had a tax collection and remittance obligation (or nexus) under Illinois tax law that would not offend U.S. commerce clause nexus principles.9 While proving attributional nexus is an arduous factual task, the additional requirement to prove that the taxpayer acted with a “knowing” mental intent significantly increases the relator’s difficulty in proving a FCA violation. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Michael Herz
This emphasis culminates in reversing and remanding because the U.S. [read post]