Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm
Factoid: Autumn Jackson, who allegedly tried to blackmail Bill Cosby several years ago by threatening to reveal her being his out-of-wedlock child, had her conviction reversed because the judge didn’t instruct the jury about this principle, but the court of appeals later reversed the reversal, because it concluded that the error was harmless, since there was no evidence that Autumn Jackson was just asking for what was rightfully owed her; the above quote is from that case, United… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
So, clearly, Russia's WTO accession is an economic no-brainer for the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm
(There is one legitimate Free Speech Zone we don’t have a problem with, it’s called the United States of America.) [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm
(There is one legitimate Free Speech Zone we don’t have a problem with, it’s called the United States of America.) [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Factoid: Autumn Jackson, who allegedly tried to blackmail Bill Cosby several years ago by threatening to reveal her being his out-of-wedlock child, had her conviction reversed because the judge didn’t instruct the jury about this principle, but the court of appeals later reversed the reversal, because it concluded that the error was harmless, since there was no evidence that Autumn Jackson was just asking for what was rightfully owed her; the above quote is from that case, United… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
It has been rendered the solemn duty of the Supreme Court of the United States, laid upon it by Congress in pursuance of the Federal Government’s power “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,” U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
What enduring value does Alexander Bickel’s now-classic The Least Dangerous Branch have today? [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:17 am
But so could liberals criticize Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
For example, during debate about the Judges’ Bill of 1925, which transferred significant docket-setting discretion to the Court, a Senator from Montana commented that he found it difficult to “yield to the idea that the Supreme Court of the United States ought to have the right in every case to say whether their jurisdiction shall be appealed to or not. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The United States Code contains dozens of criminal conspiracy statutes. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
This ruling is in in significant tension with United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
" Texas accomplished this unrepentant bit of business despite a 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court styled Atkins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 pm
v=gH476CxJxfg Today was a good day. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” In March 1783, the US Continental Congress appointed a committee to “consider the most proper means of cherishing genius and useful arts through the United States by securing to authors or publishers of new books their property in such works. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
