Search for: "United States v. Cooper" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:00 am
By way of example, "public housing" and cooperative apartments are excluded from its ambit. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States" is now up on SSRN. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
Highlights from EAB's Decision EPA Region 8 issued a PSD permit to Deseret Power Electric Cooperative (Deseret) for a proposed waste-coal-fired electric generating unit planned at the existing Bonanza Power Plant in Utah. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
"  How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
., the Court states that “[t]here is neither a bar nor a presumption against appointing foreign entities to serve as lead plaintiff, particularly where, as here, the defendant is a U.S. company and the foreign entities bought their shares in the United States”, in effect dismissing the res judicata concerns raised by other movants in relation to the appointment of a foreign entity as lead plaintiff. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:48 am by Sophia Tang
In Cathay United Bank v Gao, Shanghai High Court, (2016) Hu Min Xia Zhong No 99, the appellant, a Taiwan commercial bank, and the respondent, a Chinese citizen resident in Shanghai, entered into a Guarantee contract. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:14 pm by P.J. Blount
Space Law Christopher Daniel Johnson, Policy and Law Aspects of International Cooperation in Space, SSRN DoD report recommends ending blanket satellite export ban – Flight Global Air & Space Power Journal Canada-Japan MOU Could Lead to Launch Agreements: JAXA Vice-President – Space Ref Canada House appropriators seek changes to commercial crew – Space Politics A Military and Intelligence Clash Over Spy Satellites – EARSC House Appropriators Report CJS Bill,… [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
" Ouch.....The Court did recognize that professional sports organizations have to necessarily unite and cooperate for advancement of the league, but cooperation is not justification when that cooperation is so concerted as to fall foul of section 1 (page 14 of the decision).In closing the Court recognized that while the NFL teams share an interest in making the league successful and profitable in areas like scheduling, but that it does not justify… [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
  The fact pattern you describe is very similar to a case decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in late 2005, Rowe v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:48 am by John Floyd
United States once again cautioned that “Kilbourn v. [read post]