Search for: "United States v. Cutting" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
At an international meeting, Holland had signed a communiqué stating that cuts of at least 25% to 40% by 2020 were necessary. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
-based Tesco PLC’s announcements of accounting “irregularities” and the subsequent departure of the company’s Board chair, investor lawsuits soon followed, But as discussed here, these lawsuits were filed in the United States, on behalf of investors who had purchased American Depositary Receipts in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 10:11 am by Larry
United States, the first word in question was "minced. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:02 am by Gary A. Watt
  Just a week ago Judge Kozinski dissented from the denial of a petition for rehearing en banc in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by Harry Larson
United States Sentencing Commission as “suggest[ing] that habeas might not even be available for ‘probabilistic’ claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kevin Russell
Whether a particular property has “wetlands” as defined by the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual and whether the wetlands constitute “waters of the United States” is not a matter easily discernable by anybody. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
 Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Because this is a federal decision, it will hold significant precedential weight in similar cases filed throughout the United States in the future. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm by andrew
” In other words, a Montana warrant would purportedly empower police to seize digital content stored outside the United States, including the content of foreign persons living in foreign countries. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
Subchapter V Decision Tracker Refer to this tracker for the latest case law on Subchapter V. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]