Search for: "United States v. Felt" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2016, 5:11 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
United States Supreme Court, June 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled that it takes more than a “reasonable person” standard to prove criminal liability. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
On the date she attempted to return, she met with a nurse in the employee health office and told her she was in pain and that she felt she had restrictions. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  A Federal Judge in the Eastern District of New York just wrote a 42-page opinion concerning collateral consequences that should be required reading for every trial judge (Federal and State) in the United States. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  A Federal Judge in the Eastern District of New York just wrote a 42-page opinion concerning collateral consequences that should be required reading for every trial judge (Federal and State) in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm by Ron Coleman
Speakers: Glynn Lunney, Texas A&M University School of Law (United States) vs. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
K.G. and M.G. lived at Anetta's mother's house since moving to the United States and felt  comfortable in their home  environment. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Butler 2016); A driver’s consent must not be compelled by an ultimatum (State v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am by Lyle Denniston
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:50 pm by JB
Republicans now control the vast majority of elected offices in the states. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
The brief concludes with the assertion that no court in the United States has been asked to determine whether a language is subject to copyright protection, and they call on the judge to “declare that there is no basis in either law or policy to allow copyright in a spoken language. [read post]