Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 9:25 am
The first Monday in October traditionally marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court's yearly term - and it provides an excellent opportunity to look at the cases the Court will be hearing this year. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
TrueNorth Companies, L.C. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:22 am
Swatch, S.A. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Direct Command --Constitution of the United States Article I, V --Notes and Questions --b. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 am
Couture v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402 (1960); see State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:09 am
Case date: 27 December 2019 Case number: No. 18-16071 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
The Board placed emphasis on the place of the use of the mark in arriving and their decision, stating that there was strong evidence suggesting that Standard Hotels in the United States despite documentation referring to advertisements and promotional campaigns targeting EU customers. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
" Any person can file suit for a violation of the statute, and the proceeds are split half to the person suing and half to the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
”) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
The applicant, an American corporation, sought to register GOLF USA as a word mark for sports (and principally golf) goods and retail services.Left: a mug's game - appealing no-hope causes to the CFINo, said the examiner, "the combination ‘golf USA' brought to mind an obvious link between golf and the United States" and there was no evidence of distinctiveness acquired through use. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 6:22 pm
In the recent decision in Florida v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
