Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 9,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:22 pm
"High court to hear enemy combatant case": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the president may order that people picked up in the United States be detained indefinitely and without criminal charges. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:28 am
ISM, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1111 (TTAB 2010) [precedential] (foreign owner without use of its mark in the United States may bring a claim for dilution based on the fame of its mark here, provided that it has filed an application to register the mark in this country). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
In 2014, HMPO completed an internal review of gender marking in passports. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:29 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to "allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:43 pm
Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
(Case No. 11-civ.-4442), United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge J. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am
United Trademark Holdings, Inc. filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for use in conjunction with dolls and toy figures. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
See Lane Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
In the closing days of the recently concluded May term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its decision in Marks v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Madison and Brown v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
Moreover, it is not a monopolist in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 am
Franpovi, S.A. v. [read post]
