Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 1101 - 1120 of 29,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
The Long Life and Sudden Demise of Federal Wetlands Protection
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 am by Dan Farber
United States. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
At issue is the meaning of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, which bars people from holding office if they participated in an insurrection after having sworn to uphold the Constitution as an "officer of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 Therefore, even if Chief Justice Chase had held in Griffin’s Case, as Trump asserts, that “congressional enforcement legislation [is] the exclusive means for enforcing section 3” (Chase didn’t do so), and even if that proposition were correct (it’s not) or if Chase were right about what he did hold about the inability of courts to enforce Section 3 against someone already in office (he wasn’t), that still would not require… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Couple seeks review of revoked visa
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
With possible opinions this week, might SCOTUS soon answer if "and" means "or" in Pulsifer safety valve case?
5 Feb 2024, 10:16 am by Douglas A. Berman
[read post]
Sentencing Law and Policy - https://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/
Guest Post: Year in Review: 2023 Key Management and Professional Liability Insurance Coverage Decisions
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Blog Post: California: WCAB Practices Are Evolving: Are Their Templates Evolving as Well?
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Doesn’t this mean that this newly crafted WCAB template would apply to both? [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Taking Stock of ICJ Decisions in the ‘Ukraine v. Russia’ Cases—And implications for South Africa’s case against Israel
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am by Oona A. Hathaway
In South Africa v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
§2383, which covers participation in rebellion or insurrection, and which provides that those found guilty "shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Open Borders and Closed Courts: How the Supreme Court Laid the Seeds for the Immigration Crisis
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  Reed then explicitly rejects the Lederman view, in a discussion which concludes:   The United States is a constitutional democracy. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/