Search for: "United States v. Miranda" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2008, 11:07 am
Miranda-Uriarte, 649 F.2d 1345, 1353 (9th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Jackson, No. 072510 Conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded where defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation before being given his Miranda warnings. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
The district court admitted the statement as a present-sense impression under Fed.R.Evid. 801(1).On appeal, the Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Green, No. 06-2468 Conviction for distribution of cocaine is vacated and remanded for a new trial where: 1) the written statement of a confidential informant naming defendant as the person who had sold him drugs in a controlled buy was hearsay and not subject to an exception as a present-sense impression; 2) the prosecution could not use in its case-in-chief as substantive evidence the responses and reactions of defendant upon seeing a video purporting to depict him selling drugs, when the showing… [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
MOSLEY, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:24 pm
--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004) The landmark United States Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 7:30 am
Both Mike at C&F and Eugene at VC have posted about Judge Bybee's 9th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
" We acknowledge that it is permissible to impeach a defendant at trial based upon his pre-arrest, pre-Miranda silence. [read post]