Search for: "United States v. Morales" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Had nearly twenty years of police service with the Police Department, prior to which he served in the United States Army for eight years where he was a sergeant in the military police, receiving an honorable discharge; 2. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Had nearly twenty years of police service with the Police Department, prior to which he served in the United States Army for eight years where he was a sergeant in the military police, receiving an honorable discharge;2. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:40 am by Jon Hyman
Clayton County, the United States Supreme Court held that treating individuals differently because of their transgender status violates Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ambedkar's Concept of Social Justice and Indian Constitution Protection for Dalits – A Recent Day Analysis, (August 23, 2016).Paul Dermine, Towards the Recognition of a Pan-European Right to Same-Sex Marriage – What If Light Came from the United States? [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Had nearly twenty years of police service with the Police Department, prior to which he served in the United States Army for eight years where he was a sergeant in the military police, receiving an honorable discharge;2. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Had nearly twenty years of police service with the Police Department, prior to which he served in the United States Army for eight years where he was a sergeant in the military police, receiving an honorable discharge; 2. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 3:12 am by Erin Daly
Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
At the time the Convention was crafted, it could not have been envisaged that Article 3 (and Article 8, in its train) would ultimately entail an obligation on signatory states to protect individuals from actions taken by, or within the territory of, non signatory states – the so called “extra-territorial effect” created by various rulings of the Strasbourg Court, most notably Chahal v United Kingdom. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
At this time of year, when the American Law Institute, "the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law" (ALI About), holds its annual meeting in Washington D.C., to note the publication of a very interesting set of articles in a symposium, a "Restatement of. . . [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
In the United States, during the Democratic administrations of Presidents John F. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:41 am
It is the law and there is a rather broad constitutional right to choose to have an abortion in the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:50 pm by PaulKostro
“[A] parent’s rights to the care and companionship of his or her child are so fundamental as to be guaranteed protection under the First, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by uwlegalscholarship
• What impact, if any, will the United States Supreme Court decision in Astrue v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
These provisions of Texas' self-defense laws generally track the laws in other U.S. states. [read post]