Search for: "United States v. North"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 5,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:54 am
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitOpinion Date: 2/12/10Cite: ANSYS, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:01 pm
United States, 328 F.2d 739, 743 (10th Cir. 1964) (so holding); State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis failed to depart the United States as required by the visa. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12… [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
United States (05-1272). [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 4:54 pm
Soledad Veterans War Memorial to the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
Writing for the majority in Bostic v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court in Woodson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:20 pm
One example is Colon Health Centers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:26 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
" Judge Ervin further found that the claim was not preempted under the National Flood Insurance Act Arbitration The case of United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Quiet Title Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Sault Ste. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 5:54 pm
Today, in Moody v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
It's possible that many of the lawmakers who voted against the proposal simply didn't want their state, with not even a million inhabitants, to take such a fundamental decision against two of the country's largest and most powerful companies.There definitely is broadbased political support for the fight against app store monopolies: last fall, the Democratic majority of the United States House of Representatives adopted a report on digital markets that… [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
North Carolina Prisoners? [read post]
