Search for: "VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
IDT (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D Virginia: Virginia Patent Foundation’s motion for reconsideration denied – Intervening rights still absolve GE of damages for activities before reexamination certificate issue date (Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Butamax – BP-DuPont Biofuels JV takes Gevo to court (Green Patent Blog) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products – ALJ Gildea grants motion to terminate investigation in… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:35 am
Per Answers.com this harsh doctrine exists in only 5 states (North Carolina, Alabama, Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Crespin-Valladares v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm
LEXIS 11921 (D MD, Feb. 8, 2011), a Maryland federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that there is no chaplain at his correctional institution for Islamic and Moorish Science Temple of America inmates.In Hooper v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Boykin v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
McFadden v Maryland, __ Md. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:07 pm
The defendants filed a motion to vacate on grounds that the court lacked personal jurisdiction because of their minimal contacts with Maryland. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
., et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Byrd v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
The judge has the chutzpah to cite McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
In DuPont v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:57 pm
Generally, you would have three years from the incident date to bring a negligence claim if something like this occurred in the District of Columbia or Maryland, and two years from the incident date to bring a claim in Virginia. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Doe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Bynum v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm
Here is a crazy quote: "Iqbal will have a more significant impact on American jurisprudence than Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm
Here is a crazy quote: "Iqbal will have a more significant impact on American jurisprudence than Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Penn v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Crespo v. [read post]
