Search for: "Wages v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 8,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 10:40 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Federal Court Sides With Home Workers, August 20, 2015, California Healthline, by David Gorn More Blog Entries: Walz v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm by Jon Gelman
State of Florida No. 11-13661 CA 25) that could upend the state’s nearly 80-year workers’ compensation law.The case has its genesis in a 2012 instance where a state government worker, Elsa Padgett, sustained an on-the-job injury. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:22 am
Yesterday, in the case of Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
A plaintiff brought a putative class action in California state court alleging the defendants violated various wage and overtime requirements set forth in the California Business and Professions Code. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
Moreover, the court in Hoover found the arbitration agreement in issue was not subject to the FAA and did not encompass state statutory claims. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
As Justice Brandeis noted, in his famous dissent in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:09 am
The judgment upheld Rea's "Decision on Administrative Appeal" that certain work done under contract in the remediation of a toxic waste site pursuant to a consent decree obtained by the Environmental Protection Agency, is not subject to this state's Prevailing Wage Law because it is not a "public works" project as defined by the PWL.. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:09 pm by Sme
State of Wyoming (10th Circuit, March 28, 2017) (affirming dismissal of McCoy's complaint, among other things, because it lacked any plausible discrimination claim, and he waived any challenge to his retaliation claim)*Poff v. [read post]