Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 2:54 pm
Two updates on Yamagiwa v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that it was unlawful and a “serious abuse of power” for the Home Office to follow an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which contradicted its published policy. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit found a stop justified in Walker v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 2:46 pm
The Federal Circuit held that Hydril stated a "Walker Process fraud" claim under Walker Process Equipment Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:18 am
In Appling v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Walker’s August 2010 decision striking down “Proposition 8″ will now go into effect formally. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
See New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Professors Kent Barnett & Christopher Walker argue in their piece, based on the amici curiae brief they filed, that the Court should not overrule Chevron in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
Both he and Lady Hale (at §70) cited D v Home Office [2006] 1 WLR 1003 apparently with approval which required a causation test as regards breaches of the 2001 Rules. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Derick Walker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Perry v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:40 am
The license plate case — Walker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:29 am
Co., 87 N.Y.2d 308 (1995), the district court reminded that ""the pleading elements required to state a claim for punitive damages as an additional and exemplary remedy when the claim arises from a breach of contract" are: (1) defendant's conduct must be actionable as an independent tort; (2) the tortious conduct must be of the egregious nature set forth in Walker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) - Read Judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s “Anne Frank” policy of sending back gay refugees to their home countries where they feared persecution is unlawful as it breached their human rights.. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
by its mRNA (the encoding gene) in T-cell and B-cell lymphomas, and (v) the information that Neutrokine-? [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
