Search for: "Washington Citizens Action of Washington v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
To many in Washington, the rise of China and the revanchism of Russia herald the return of great power competition. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19]  Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am by Sasha Volokh
On the contrary, this is an easy case for state action, because rulemaking, investigation, and enforcement of federal law are traditionally exclusive public functions. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 20-330, concerns whether business competitors of the Trump International Hotel have the right to sue the then-president under the foreign and domestic emoluments clauses. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
  9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement for costs associated with a removal action at the Anderson-Calhoun Mine and Mill Site in Leadpoint, Washington, with settling party Blue Tee Corporation. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
In his book, The Run of His Life, The People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The Court’s second round of review of the case, in Stern v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
” The report leave no doubt about the importance of anticompetitive enforcement; as the report states, “compliance by signatory states is critical in draining the supply of bribe money that distorts public decision making in some of the world’s poorest states, with disastrous consequences for their citizens. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:19 pm
Fallback B, Part 2: The case of Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media A UK citizen has accused YouTube of collecting the data of children under the age of 13 in a complaint to the ICO. [read post]