Search for: "AC v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 12:42 am by zshapiro
Monroe Ace Setser was charged in both Federal and state courts with methamphetamine related charges. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valencia v Llupar [2012] EWCA Civ 396 (30 March 2012) Al -Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 358 (29 March 2012) Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 379 (29 March 2012) Berky, R (on the application of) v Newport City Council & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 378 (29 March 2012) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
It has already proved it has no problem shunning precedent or being out-of-touch, for example see Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by P.J. Blount
., der Continental Airlines Inc. und der United Airlines Inc. auf der einen und dem Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Minister für Energie und Klimawandel) auf der anderen Seite über die Gültigkeit der vom Vereinigten Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland erlassenen Maßnahmen zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2008/101/EG. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by nflatow
Ryan affects the right to counsel during the state collateral appeal process, while Lafler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am by INFORRM
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrim­ination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state ac­tion to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by INFORRM
The recent Tesla v BBC case ([2012] EWHC 310 (QB)) is a notable exception. [read post]