Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 8:43 pm
(You can hear more from Florence in an ACS podcast interview. ) via www.aclu.org [ Supreme Court decision @ Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
Yesterday a divided Supreme Court ruled in Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:06 am
Yesterday a divided Supreme Court ruled in Florence v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:42 am
Monroe Ace Setser was charged in both Federal and state courts with methamphetamine related charges. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:06 pm
Last Wednesday in Setser v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valencia v Llupar [2012] EWCA Civ 396 (30 March 2012) Al -Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 358 (29 March 2012) Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 379 (29 March 2012) Berky, R (on the application of) v Newport City Council & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 378 (29 March 2012) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm
The EMA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
The EMA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
The EMA v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm
It has already proved it has no problem shunning precedent or being out-of-touch, for example see Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
., der Continental Airlines Inc. und der United Airlines Inc. auf der einen und dem Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Minister für Energie und Klimawandel) auf der anderen Seite über die Gültigkeit der vom Vereinigten Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland erlassenen Maßnahmen zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2008/101/EG. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Ryan affects the right to counsel during the state collateral appeal process, while Lafler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
TITLE V–GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 501. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm
The case, Sierra Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]