Search for: "Arnold v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Long v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Judge Arnold has been sitting on the case since it was remanded. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Mr Justice Arnold and Mr Justice Dingemans, Mr Justice Popplewell, all of whom have presided over media cases, have been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm
no7) Lyndon Johnson (14)--ditto5) Benedict Arnold (17)--too low5) Woodrow Wilson (17)--huh? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state's attorney general to appeal a federal ruling that overturned the state's gay marriage ban. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 6:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
In light of the Gillette principle, it would not be justified to grant the patent holder protection against products that are not novel or inventive over the prior art (an issue that was also touched upon by Arnold LJ in FibroGen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
(Alan S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
