Search for: "B/T Enterprises"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2021, 11:24 am
§841(b)(1)(B). [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 4:43 pm
The text we read was, I believe, from his Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad Bhāṣya. Śaṅkara was trying to illuminate the meaning of the root text in light of his Advaitavāda. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
(Basically, the case allowed him to make an important point about the function of respondeat superior: any enterprise carries with it certain risks, and when such a risk materializes, we ought to make the enterprise internalize the costs.) [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:34 am
Tell that fly on the wall we don’t need him. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Rev. 381, 390-91 (1999); Dep’t of Justice, Financial Institution Fraud Special Report, June 30, 1995 [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/q7bVydZDSi -> Embracing Technology: A New Hope for Digital Distribution http://t.co/uTMMbrjRSR -> Plagiarism matters: Schavan loses appeal; Bassem Youssef has problems http://t.co/WjLxGqohdg -> IP in the Space Sector Webinar – Presentation Slides http://t.co/tTyPT7N8k3 – not much on IP in space in the slides though -> Speaking at Cato on IP in the Trans-Pacific Partnership http://t.co/dH9Q8Bj3PU -> WIPO Treaties will be ratified by Canada soon… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The government therefore concludes Kaspersky has no standing to bring its suit. b. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
§ 5845(b) includes non-mechanical bump stocks; and (2) if the definition of “machinegun” in Section 5845(b) is ambiguous, whether that ambiguity should be construed against the government. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
These difficult cases – more widespread than many realize – illuminate an aspect of the Constitution that has been there all along: the Constitution tells us what the law isn't, but not always what it is. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:56 am
He didn't get a mention in the Times story. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
By this stage in the judgment it looked like the Claimant might have unlocked the key to this case but two further barriers remained - negotiating the must fit exclusion and, most importantly, establishing infringement.The "must fit" or "interface" exclusion comes from section 213(3)(b)(i) CDPA. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:00 am
Lazy b*stards. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
They felt some disaffection as a result of grading--not just receiving lower grades than they were used to, but the feeling that the difference between, say, a B and a B+ was somewhat arbitrary, and that a huge additional investment of time and study might or might not result in a marginal uptick in grades. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We don’t discuss damages much, except to fulminate about punitive damages. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
This is a class B felony with a mandatory term of incarceration punishable up to a maximum of twenty-five years. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:54 pm
Doesn't point 24 mean "When you make all IP available through compulsory licensing, don't forget to pay lip-service to the payment of some token royalty? [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:20 pm
The statue requires coverage for all recommendations classified as “A” or “B” by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:06 am
Don’t Collect Data You Can’t Secure IT professionals also need to be aware that just because they have the capability to collect a certain class of data, doing so may not be in their organization’s best interest. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 4:22 am
Doesn’t seem like enough. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:05 am
That is Enterprise Recourse Planning, meaning payroll, accountancy, HR etc. [read post]
